26-Jul-2019, 09:41 PM
I've been meaning to write this for a while now but I've been too busy listening to music Anyone who has read some of my posts would probably know how I feel about this awesome software....and I really don't even use it to its fullest potential.
The purpose of this post is not necessarily to leave a testimonial but to ask why is this software not the "gold standard" for those who test audio hardware and streaming devices? Allow me to explain.
My search for a cost effective Tidal streamer led me to the Raspberry Pi, a 35$ board with potential galore! With a proper HAT and a modest but overachieving power supply the caliber of sound is what I would consider to be audiophile quality. I use an Allo digione with an iFi Audio 5v power supply. Combined cost with case? About 200$ My first attempt at an audiophile quality computer cost me 200$ for the soundcard alone, and then you still needed a whole computer.....and the sound wasn't even close!
Now to the crux of the matter. Before purchasing the Pi I watched and read many reviews and noticed one thing in common no matter the HAT being tested. The software was almost always the same. The preferred software was Volumio. Now, I'm not going to down Volumio as I'll explain later but my question is why? If I was to test a piece of gear wouldn't I want the most accurate software possible?
Of course when I recieved my new Pi and added peripherals the first thing I did was load up Volumio onto an SD card and voila! Great sound! Music sounded well, musical. But there were things that bothered me that I thought were limitations specific to my setup.....room, components, speakers, etc. I had almost accepted the lack of pinpoint imaging and smeared treble and somewhat blurred focus. It sounded like I was listening to music through an analog filter, which for some might sound like a good thing.
I was looking for more accuracy and better imaging and I knew my system was capable of that so I tried other softwares and wasn't impressed until I finally found Snakeoil. The details popped out and the imaging was as if the instruments and the vocals were suspended in space right in front of me. Not sure what kind of voodoo this software uses but whatever it is it just sounds "right"
As I said before, I'm not trying to be negative about Volumio. It is great software, there is no doubt. Every once in a while I find myself wanting a more "analog" sound and I load up that SD card with Volumio and scratch that itch. But when I want my music to sound the way I think it was intended I haven't found a piece of software that rings all the bells like Snakeoil does. And that is why I think Snakeoil should be the "gold standard" in music software. Nothing else sounds as accurate....in my humble opinion, of course.
The purpose of this post is not necessarily to leave a testimonial but to ask why is this software not the "gold standard" for those who test audio hardware and streaming devices? Allow me to explain.
My search for a cost effective Tidal streamer led me to the Raspberry Pi, a 35$ board with potential galore! With a proper HAT and a modest but overachieving power supply the caliber of sound is what I would consider to be audiophile quality. I use an Allo digione with an iFi Audio 5v power supply. Combined cost with case? About 200$ My first attempt at an audiophile quality computer cost me 200$ for the soundcard alone, and then you still needed a whole computer.....and the sound wasn't even close!
Now to the crux of the matter. Before purchasing the Pi I watched and read many reviews and noticed one thing in common no matter the HAT being tested. The software was almost always the same. The preferred software was Volumio. Now, I'm not going to down Volumio as I'll explain later but my question is why? If I was to test a piece of gear wouldn't I want the most accurate software possible?
Of course when I recieved my new Pi and added peripherals the first thing I did was load up Volumio onto an SD card and voila! Great sound! Music sounded well, musical. But there were things that bothered me that I thought were limitations specific to my setup.....room, components, speakers, etc. I had almost accepted the lack of pinpoint imaging and smeared treble and somewhat blurred focus. It sounded like I was listening to music through an analog filter, which for some might sound like a good thing.
I was looking for more accuracy and better imaging and I knew my system was capable of that so I tried other softwares and wasn't impressed until I finally found Snakeoil. The details popped out and the imaging was as if the instruments and the vocals were suspended in space right in front of me. Not sure what kind of voodoo this software uses but whatever it is it just sounds "right"
As I said before, I'm not trying to be negative about Volumio. It is great software, there is no doubt. Every once in a while I find myself wanting a more "analog" sound and I load up that SD card with Volumio and scratch that itch. But when I want my music to sound the way I think it was intended I haven't found a piece of software that rings all the bells like Snakeoil does. And that is why I think Snakeoil should be the "gold standard" in music software. Nothing else sounds as accurate....in my humble opinion, of course.